
In a strongly-worded letter to Prime
Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, Chief Minister Pervez Khattak has
protested a set of recent decisions, taken by the federal government on
financial, oil and gas and electricity matters without taking the
provinces into confidence, with far-reaching consequences.
“I
am also perturbed to express my concern over the mode and manner the
energy issues are dealt at federal level these days,” Mr Khattak wrote,
reminding the prime minister that Pakistan is a federation based on the
principles of cooperative federalism, where provinces cannot be simply
ignored in important matters and a number of constitutional institutions
existed to safeguard the provinces’ interest.
If this
was not enough, the KP chief minister went on to demand provincial
representation in all important forums, “especially relating to energy”,
such as the Private Power & Infrastructure Board (PPIB), Central
Power Purchase Agency-Guarantee (CPPA-G), National Transmission &
Dispatch Company (NTDC), Alternative Energy Development Board (AEDB),
gas companies and related regulatory bodies.
CM Khattak deplores centre’s ‘unilateral’ decision-making; seeks provincial representation on all energy-related forums
The chief minister particularly opposed the centre’s recent
decision to discontinue upfront tariff-based power projects in the
renewable sector against the deterioration of the provincial investment
climate.
He said the CCI was one of the constitutional
forums where “all subjects contained in Part II of the Fourth Schedule
are to be discussed, dilated upon and decided. Electricity as well as
oil and gas are such subjects, but instead of involving provinces in
important policy matters concerning energy, matters are being directly
taken to Economic Coordination Committee and the Cabinet Committee on
Energy, which is a glaring violation of Article 154 [of the
Constitution]”.
Mr Khattak maintained that other
provinces had also raised concerns, and asked for the matter to be
placed on agenda of the next CCI meeting. “In the meantime, I urge you
to direct all concerned to abide by the mandate of the Constitution in
letter and spirit in terms of Article 5 of the Constitution,” he wrote.
He
said that the recent federal government announcement on power purchase
agreements, which was made without taking the provincial governments
into confidence, had not only shaken their confidence, but also
frustrated a large number of investors in hydel power projects.
Challenging
the basis of the policy shift, Mr Khattak wrote: “The premise whereupon
this policy is based is faulty in essence and anchored on phony
presumptions and suppositions of achieving the target excess generation
vis-a-vis demand”.
“The decision will surely damage the
trust between the citizens of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and [the] federal
government,” he warned, adding that the move would also overburden
citizens by ignoring the most economical power generation method, i.e.
hydroelectric, and giving preference to coal and LNG-based power
projects.
As a seasoned politician with a rich
understanding of issues relating to energy and power, Prime Minister
Abbasi must be aware of the sensitivities attached to the matter of net
hydel profit and the way it had been historically dealt by the AGN Kazi
Committee and other constitutional forums, Mr Khattak wrote.
Recalling
that the formula for payment to the provinces had been endorsed by the
CCI, the KP CM said that in its meeting on Aug 25, 2017, the council had
discussed a summary seeking the adoption of the AGN Kazi methodology
for measuring net hydel power profit.
The matter was
referred back to Ministry of Inter-Provincial Coordination for review,
and in its meeting on Sept 19, 2017, the IPC deliberated the issue and
recommended the requests from KP and Punjab to the CCI for finalization
of the award.
Despite a crystal-clear legal position, net
hydel profits were being dealt with in an ad hoc manner, making it a
sore subject for hydel power-generating provinces and KP in particular.
He
said the province had brought the matter to attention of the CCI many
times and asked the centre to “act magnanimously” while respecting the
sentiments of a smaller federation unit to prevent further mistrust.