THEY fell in love at Jamia Millia Islamia, where they were
both students. It was the early ’90s, and they were both studying mass
communications. It was also the beginning of the private television
channel boom. He was Muslim. She was Hindu. Both families opposed the
relationship. To escape them, Suhaib Ilyasi, who would one day host the
television show India’s Most Wanted, and Anju Singh, eloped to London.
There in 1993 they got married. Anju converted to Islam and became
Afsan, and everything seemed set for their ‘happily ever after’.
Except
that there was no happy ending to this love story. When the couple
returned to India in 1994, all their troubles were resurrected. Anju
couldn’t live in Ilyasi’s house and returned to London. According to her
brother, she was very unhappy in the marriage and considered a divorce
during that time. But she returned to India and a year later the couple
had a daughter whom they named Aaliya. Their problems continued and so
did Anju’s efforts to leave, this time to her sister’s house in Canada.
Ilyasi showed up to coax her back, and in 1998 she returned again to
India.
That same year, an idea that the couple had come
up with together came to fruition. In their first year together in
London, Anju and Ilyasi had been inspired by the British show Crime
Stoppers and wanted to create an Indian version of the same show. The
two shot a pilot of the show, with the striking and beautiful Anju as
the anchor. They were able to sell the show to ZeeTV but when it finally
aired in March 1998, it was Suhaib Ilyasi who would be the anchor. The
show, India’s Most Wanted, would make him famous. After its initial run
of over 50 episodes, ZeeTV renewed the contract. Their idea had been a
hit.
Many abusive men who drive their wives to suicide are not believed to be culpable in their deaths.
Their marriage, however, remained a flop. In 1998, not long
after the show first aired, troubles prompted Anju to return to Canada
again. The same cycle of separation and reconciliation followed.
Relatives alleged that Ilyasi would harass Anju that her family had not
provided enough of a dowry. In the February of 1999, Anju returned to
India again, convinced this time by Ilyasi’s promises of a new
apartment. They did buy a new apartment and spent 10 months redecorating
and renovating it. The plan was to have a huge housewarming party on
Jan 16, 2000, Anju’s birthday. The celebration would never happen.
On
the evening of Jan 10, 2000, police were called to the couple’s
apartment in Delhi. There they found Anju stabbed to death. Ilyasi said
she had committed suicide and that he had tried to stop her by grabbing
the knife. This was the beginning of a murder investigation that would
last over 17 years. There would be differing autopsy reports; one
insisted that homicide could not be ruled out. There would be divergent
evidentiary analysis; one stated that Ilyasi’s fingerprints could not be
found on the knife despite his own admission that he had tried to grab
it from Anju as she tried to stab herself to death. Then there was the
dubious manner of the death itself; people who commit suicide rarely
stab themselves, and they almost never stab themselves twice. Anju had
multiple stab wounds.
Last week, Anju’s family, which
had been subjected to hearing after hearing, arguments, and a custody
battle over the couple’s daughter, finally got some justice. Ilyasi,
ironically the host of one of the most popular Indian television crime
shows, was declared a criminal himself and found guilty of his wife’s
murder. A man whose livelihood was to urge the apprehension of other
criminals was finally imprisoned himself.
The
high-profile nature of the Ilyasi murder case has meant that it has
received a lot of attention. Many of the factors defining the case,
however, are not altogether unknown in Pakistan and India. A couple fall
in love and fail to get family support for their marriage. They get
married anyway but once married the power dynamic between the two
changes. In this particular case, while the two had come up with the
idea of the show together, it was Ilyasi who hogged the limelight and
left Anju at the sidelines.
Unlike an arranged marriage,
this one did not have two families rooting for it and remained fragile
and became ultimately murderous. That is not of course to say that
arranged marriages are not abusive marriages. The harassment over dowry,
the hostility of in-laws, are all factors that have plagued even those
marriages that have had the blessing of both the families concerned.
Then
there is the murder that took an innocent woman’s life. In this case,
the high profile of the husband likely ensured greater attention for the
investigation. In most other cases, the cover story of suicide is
easily believed by police and by family members. The fact that a large
number of abused women are understandably severely depressed and fed up
of the tribulations of their existence makes investigations unlikely and
rare. Another ignored dimension is the fact that many abusive men who
drive their wives to suicide are not believed to be culpable in their
deaths even while being the primary cause of it.
All
over the world, in poor countries and in rich ones, murder by an
intimate partner is a leading cause of death for women of childbearing
age. High-profile cases like Ilyasi’s are windows through which we can
see the dynamics inside so many homes and so many marriages. Ilyasi,
wife killer, may finally be in prison but many others roam free,
harassing and beating and intimidating and abusing, in plain sight,
while the world looks the other away.
