ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court will hand down on Friday
(today) the anxiously-awaited judgement that will determine the
political fate of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf chief Imran Khan and
secretary general Jahangir Khan Tareen amid the turbulent political
environment in the country.
Once again, Courtroom No 1
will be the focus of attention when a three-judge bench consisting of
Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar, Justice Umar Ata Bandial and Justice
Faisal Arab will announce its verdict on two petitions moved on Nov 2
last year by Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz leader Hanif Abbasi seeking
disqualification of Mr Khan and Mr Tareen for not disclosing their
assets, owning offshore companies and running a foreign-aided party.
The verdict will be announced at 2pm after Friday prayers.
Last
time, Courtroom No 1 came into limelight when a five-judge SC bench
comprising Justices Asif Saeed Khosa, Gulzar Ahmed, Ejaz Afzal Khan,
Sheikh Azmat Saeed and Ijaz-ul-Ahsan disqualified Nawaz Sharif as prime minister in the Panama Papers case
and directed the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to file three
corruption references against Mr Sharif and members of his family.
Three-judge bench will hand down verdict on PML-N leader’s petitions seeking disqualification of the two PTI leaders
The apex court had on Nov 14 closed the proceedings and reserved its ruling on Mr Abbasi’s petitions.
The
Islamabad police have been directed to ensure tight security in and
around the Supreme Court to avoid any untoward incident at the time of
the announcement of the judgement.
“Will the captain
[Imran Khan] continue to stand on the pitch or be shown the pavilion is a
million dollar question which can only be answered when the judgement
is announced,” commented a senior counsel who observed the entire court
proceedings with interest.
When asked about his
expectations, senior counsel Mohammad Akram Sheikh, who had argued the
case on behalf of Hanif Abbasi, said: “We hope that the Supreme Court
will decide in consistence with the law declared by it in a similar
matter by a larger bench (Panama Papers case) as the question in the two
[cases] are absolutely identical as much as though not corruption or
the criminal charge but the concealment of assets and making of false
declaration.”
But PTI spokesperson Fawad Chaudhry
insisted that it would be absurd drawing comparison between the case of
Nawaz Sharif and those of Imran Khan and Jahangir Tareen, adding that
the PTI side had during the course of hearing explained the money trail
of even a single penny.
Besides, he said, there was no allegation of money laundering or corruption against Mr Khan.
Likewise,
he said, the case against Mr Tareen had started with money laundering
but ended with allegations of concealment of assets. In this case too,
Mr Tareen did not hide anything from the court and come out with clean
hands, he added.
Asked if Mr Khan and Mr Tareen would
come to the court, along with other party leaders, to witness the
historic moment, the spokesman said he would alone be in the courtroom.
Chaudhry
Faisal Hussain, who also assisted the PTI’s panel of counsel in the
case, said he was confident that the petitions would be dismissed
because no allegations of dishonesty could be attributed to Mr Khan or
Mr Tareen since both had provided the money trail and accounted for even
a single penny. On the other hand, he claimed, Nawaz Sharif and his
family had hidden everything from the court and never provided the money
trail.
In his concluding arguments, Advocate Naeem
Bokhari, the counsel for Imran Khan, had argued that his case should not
be treated like that of Panama Papers because there was no question of
money going out of the country, though it could be said that there was a
‘young man’ who could not manage his accounts properly.
Akram
Sheikh had contended that Mr Khan had shifted his stance before the
court 18 times, adding that Justice Khosa had in the Panama Papers case
judgement mentioned the word shifting stances for Nawaz Sharif twice and
eventually disqualified him.
